PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 22, 2016Circulation2,481 citationsOpen Access

Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: A Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

View Full Paper
RRRobert RossSBSteven N. BlairRARoss Arena

Key Points

  • The aim is to examine the significance of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in predicting health outcomes and improving risk assessment.
  • Review current evidence linking CRF to cardiovascular disease and mortality.
  • Highlight CRF's predictive power compared to traditional risk factors.
  • Suggest future research directions to enhance CRF integration in clinical practice.
  • Low CRF is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality.
  • Addition of CRF to traditional risk factors improves risk reclassification for adverse health outcomes.
  • Incorporating CRF can enhance patient management and promote lifestyle changes to reduce cardiovascular risk.

Abstract

Mounting evidence has firmly established that low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) are associated with a high risk of cardiovascular disease, all-cause mortality, and mortality rates attributable to various cancers. A growing body of epidemiological and clinical evidence demonstrates not only that CRF is a potentially stronger predictor of mortality than established risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, high cholesterol, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, but that the addition of CRF to traditional risk factors significantly improves the reclassification of risk for adverse outcomes. The purpose of this statement is to review current knowledge related to the association between CRF and health outcomes, increase awareness of the added value of CRF to improve risk prediction, and suggest future directions in research. Although the statement is not intended to be a comprehensive review, critical references that address important advances in the field are highlighted. The underlying premise of this statement is that the addition of CRF for risk classification presents health professionals with unique opportunities to improve patient management and to encourage lifestyle-based strategies designed to reduce cardiovascular risk. These opportunities must be realized to optimize the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease and hence meet the American Heart Association’s 2020 goals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ross et al. (2016) studied this question. Low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness are associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality compared to traditional risk factors.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6977923c16cf21d8c9504c49https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000461
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluating current assessment techniques of cardiorespiratory fitness2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease2022 · 16 citations
  3. 3The genetic case for cardiorespiratory fitness as a clinical vital sign and the routine prescription of physical activity in healthcare2021 · 61 citations
  4. 4Impact of cardiorespiratory fitness changes in cardiac rehabilitation2019 · 4 citations
  5. 5The genetic case for cardiorespiratory fitness as a clinical vital sign and the routine prescription of physical activity in healthcare2020 · 6 citations