Background examples include 87% accuracy in a multi-institutional study, 82% accuracy/AUC 0.86 using texture-derivatives, 86% balanced accuracy with transfer learning, 88% accuracy/AUC 0.86 with deep learning, and AUC 0.90 in a hybrid QUS and molecular-subtype model. Early monitoring improved discrimination: week-1 results ranged from AUC 0.81 to 1.00 and accuracy 70 to 100%, noting that the upper bound was reported in a small cohort using combined QUS and diffuse optical spectroscopy features, while week 4 typically peaked (AUC 0.87–0.91; accuracy 80–86% in observational cohorts), and one series reported week-8 accuracy of 93%. Across reporting cohorts, mean AUC increased with a 0.05 absolute gain. A randomized feasibility study reported prospective week-4 model accuracy of 98% and demonstrated decision impact. Conclusions: QUS radiomics provides informative a priori prediction and strengthens by weeks 1–4 of NAC, supporting adaptive treatment windows without contrast or radiation. Standardized radiofrequency (RF) access, normalization, region of interest (ROI)/margin definitions, and external validation are priorities for clinical translation.
Putin et al. (Sun,) studied this question.