Not receiving palliative care in heart failure patients was associated with higher risks of all-cause hospitalization (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.32-1.53) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.66; 95% CI 2.53-2.80).
Case-Control (n=43,349)
Yes
Does palliative care reduce hospitalization and mortality in adults with incident heart failure?
43,349 adults (aged ≥18 years) with incident heart failure in England (matched analysis included 5,911 palliative care cases and 16,893 controls).
Palliative care following heart failure diagnosis
No palliative care (matched on age at HF diagnosis, sex, region, year of HF diagnosis, and history of cancer)
Risks of cardiovascular hospitalization, all-cause hospitalization, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortalityhard clinical
Palliative care in incident heart failure is associated with significantly lower risks of hospitalization and mortality, highlighting a missed opportunity given its current underutilization.
Effect estimate: HR 1.42 (95% CI 1.32-1.53)
Abstract Introduction Heart failure (HF) represents a major global healthcare burden. In patients with ongoing symptoms despite optimal treatment, palliative care (PC) is expected to improve coordination of care and thereby, patient orientated outcomes, but current utilisation patterns are not well-studied. Methods Using linked electronic health records from England (Clinical Practice Research Datalink), of individuals aged ≥18 years with incident HF, we assessed predictors of receiving palliative care following HF diagnosis using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models. We matched HF patients who received PC with those who did not (on age at HF diagnosis, sex, region, year of HF diagnosis and history of cancer at HF diagnosis) to compare risks of cardiovascular and all-cause hospitalisation and mortality in follow-up. Results We included 36,358 individuals with HF who did not receive PC during follow-up and 6,991 individuals who did. Higher age at HF diagnosis, and the presence of comorbidities including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease and cancer were associated with higher likelihood of receiving PC. 5,911 PC cases and 16,893 controls were included in the matched analysis. PC utilisation varied greatly across the UK. Estimated adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause hospitalisation were higher in people not receiving PC: 1.42 (1.32, 1.53), as were HF hospitalisation: 1.27 (1.19, 1.35), all-cause mortality: 2.66 (2.53, 2.80) and cardiovascular mortality: 2.16 (2.00, 2.33). Interpretation: In individuals with HF, PC has the potential to reduce important patient-orientated outcomes and thereby improve quality of life in the later stages of the disease. Importantly, despite these positive expected outcomes, PC is currently rarely utilised. There are likely to be opportunities to use PC earlier in HF trajectories, but unmeasured confounding or confounding by indication in observational data and the lack of patient-level measures of quality of life, complicate the estimation of potential benefits of PC in HF and underscore the need for future clinical trials.Characteristics by palliative care use
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pasea et al. (Sat,) conducted a case-control in Heart failure (n=43,349). Palliative care vs. No palliative care was evaluated on All-cause hospitalisation (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.32-1.53). Not receiving palliative care in heart failure patients was associated with higher risks of all-cause hospitalization (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.32-1.53) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.66; 95% CI 2.53-2.80).
synapsesocial.com/papers/698585ea8f7c464f23009a8d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.1072
L Pasea
Sarah Ali
Sorbonne Université
C Chu
European Heart Journal
University College London
Utrecht University
University of Leeds
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: