This work develops a temporally grounded framework for terrestrial gravitation motivated by the empirical dominance of time- and frequency-based measurements in modern gravity experiments. Contemporary gravimetry increasingly relies on atomic clocks, frequency comparisons, and quantum phase observables, which probe gravitational structure more directly and with higher precision than force- or acceleration-based instruments. In the proposed framework, gravity is identified with the spatial gradient of a local temporal realization rate rather than with a force or spacetime curvature as such. Local acceleration emerges as a derived and strongly constrained quantity, while clock rates and quantum phase accumulation constitute the primary gravitational observables. Explicit terrestrial-scale analysis shows that the framework reproduces the local predictions of Newtonian gravity and General Relativity to extremely high accuracy, as enforced by a global temporal constraint. Beyond numerical agreement with established theory, the framework provides a mechanistic explanation for several empirically established features that remain conceptually unexplained in standard descriptions, including the primacy of clock-based gravimetry, the sensitivity of quantum systems to gravity in the absence of force, the exceptional long-term stability of the terrestrial gravitational field, and the limited operational scope of acceleration–gravity equivalence. An appendix identifies a well-defined operational regime in which time-integrated observables—such as long-duration clock comparisons and accumulated quantum phase—are, in principle, capable of distinguishing a temporal-gradient description from force-based gravity, while clarifying why existing terrestrial experiments are not yet sensitive to this regime. The work thus reframes terrestrial gravitation in terms of temporally grounded observables without contradiction to current experimental results and delineates a clear pathway for future empirical tests.
Luka Gluvić (Tue,) studied this question.