PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology0 citationsOpen Access

Poster Session II - A258 THE ROLE OF BACTERIAL LPC AND LPA IN CHRONIC ABDOMINAL PAIN: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY IN PATIENTS WITH IBD

View Full Paper
JAJ S AlawfiJPJ PujoFVF A Vicentini

Key Points

  • To explore the relationship between fecal LPC and LPA levels, chronic abdominal pain, and dietary phosphatidylcholine in IBD patients.
  • Conducted a longitudinal study enrolling IBD patients in remission with chronic abdominal pain.
  • Assessed pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and collected daily stool samples.
  • Analyzed fecal LPC and LPA using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS).
  • Evaluated dietary intake using a 3-day food diary and analyzed it with ESHA software.
  • Eight patients (female=6; age 43.5) completed the study, with higher pain scores in patients with previous bowel surgery.
  • Fecal LPC and LPA levels were higher during periods of increased abdominal pain.
  • Average choline and phosphatidylcholine intake were found to be below recommended levels for both males and females.

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience abdominal pain, despite being in remission, and many associate their pain with the intake of certain foods. Emerging evidence links lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) to neuropathic pain, with preclinical studies suggesting that gut bacteria are able to produce these compounds from dietary phosphatidylcholine (PC). Aims To study the association between fecal LPC and LPA, abdominal pain, and dietary PC intake in patients with IBD. Methods IBD patients in remission (determined endoscopically and/or by fecal calprotectin250 mg/kg) with chronic abdominal pain were enrolled in a longitudinal study. Pain was assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and stool samples were collected daily for at least one week; diet was studied by a 3-day diary. Fecal LPC and LPA were extracted using Bligh-Dyer and solid phase extraction techniques and analysed using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS). Dietary intake, focused on total choline and PC, was assessed by ESHA software. Results Eight patients (female=6; Crohn’s disease=2, UC = 6; age 43.5 endif--5.3 years) completed the study. Patients with previous bowel surgery reported higher pain scores compared to those without surgery (49.8 endif--8.9 vs 19.7 endif--9.2). Fecal LPA and LPC were elevated in periods of high pain compared to low pain (Table 1). The estimated choline intake was 358.8 endif--48.4 and 297.8 endif--29.3 mg/d in males and females, respectively (adequate intake 550 and 425 mg/d). The estimated PC intake was 233.0 endif--43.8 and 160.1 endif--24.3 mg/d in males and females, respectively. There was no clear association between intake of PC and pain scores. Conclusions IBD patients with colitis in remission suffer from chronic abdominal pain, more severe in those with previous bowel resection. Fecal LPC and LPA concentrations fluctuate, with higher levels associated with high pain. Patients with IBD have low choline intake, possibly unconsciously avoiding dietary substrates for bacterial LPC and LPA production. Funding Agencies Crohn’s Colitis Foundation (US), J.A received Ph.D scholarship from Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alawfi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b4139b75e639e9b08eb7https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.257
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper