The discipline of ultrarunning, quantitatively defined as any footrace exceeding the traditional marathon distance of 42.195 kilometers, represents a unique intersection of extreme physiological demand and profound psychological necessity. Historically viewed as a fringe activity for the eccentric few, the sport has witnessed a meteoric rise in global participation over the last decade, with events like the Ultra-Trail du Mont-Blanc (UTMB), the Western States Endurance Run, and the Marathon des Sables seeing exponential growth in registration numbers.1 This surge has catalyzed a shift in the scientific understanding of endurance. Where early research focused almost exclusively on metabolic efficiency, VO2 max, and biomechanics, contemporary inquiry increasingly recognizes that the limiting factor in events lasting 24, 48, or even 100+ hours is often not the muscle, but the mind. The primary objective of this report is to act as a definitive meta-analysis of the current state of psychology in ultrarunning. We aim to synthesize data from peer-reviewed research to construct a unified "Psychobiological Model of Ultra-Endurance." This model posits that performance is determined by a complex interplay of personality traits, cognitive strategies, motivational orientations, and psychopathological risks. By integrating quantitative data from validated instruments such as the Sport Mental Toughness Questionnaire (SMTQ), the Endurance Sport Self-Efficacy Scale (ESSES), and the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA), alongside qualitative phenomenological accounts, this report provides a granular examination of what distinguishes the ultrarunner from the marathoner, and the finisher from the non-finisher.3 Furthermore, this analysis addresses a critical and often under-discussed paradox in the literature: the duality of the ultrarunning psyche. Systematic reviews have identified that while these athletes possess superior resilience and mental toughness, they also exhibit elevated rates of specific psychopathologies, including exercise addiction, disordered eating, and masked depression.3 Unraveling this complexity is essential not only for optimizing performance but also for safeguarding the long-term mental health of the athlete.
Owen R. Thornton (Mon,) studied this question.