ABSTRACT Aims To report on the unique perspectives of senior nursing leaders on the value proposition of the Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) role, their organisational experience and the barriers and facilitators to optimise and promote the long‐term sustainability. Design A qualitative sub‐study of a larger multi‐method study focused on informing policy recommendations to optimise the CNS workforce, informed by integrated knowledge translation. Methods Chief Nursing Officers (CNOs) and other senior leaders in all health authorities in British Columbia, Canada, were invited to participate in semi‐structured interviews via video call between August–December 2023. We recruited 13 participants from diverse health regions, including 5 CNOs. Results Leaders collectively conveyed a renewed interest in the CNS role to support nursing and multidisciplinary teams to better meet patient and system needs, and a sense of urgency to optimise the role in diverse settings. The overarching theme of “success by design” was supported by three thematic priorities: (1) understanding the CNS role, (2) a role that needs protection and connections and (3) moving forward together. Views were aligned to co‐construct implementation‐ready policy recommendations to guide provincial strategies. Conclusion Senior leaders reported a common understanding of the value‐add of the CNS workforce and had a shared experience of barriers to optimisation. Contemporary policy guidance is needed to equip health systems to address this gap. Impact Across international regions, the role of CNSs is not fully optimised. This is a wasted opportunity to address the pressing need for nursing practice leaders to transform health systems and improve outcomes. This study provides new knowledge about the perspectives of Chief Nursing Officers and other nursing leaders to shape comprehensive and targeted policy recommendations and address enduring and new challenges to realise the full impact of the CNS workforce. Reporting Methods We have adhered to COREQ reporting guidelines (See supplemental file). Patient and Public Involvement This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Lauck et al. (Wed,) studied this question.