Surgical innovation continues to evolve toward approaches that are safer, more efficient, and better aligned with patient-centered care. Office-based surgery (OBS), particularly when performed under wide-awake local anesthesia, represents one of the most promising shifts in surgical delivery during the past 2 decades.1,2 Eliminating sedation with almost painless tumescent local anesthesia injection combines safety, convenience, and efficiency for many hand, plastic, orthopedic, and general surgery procedures. An office surgical suite is a dedicated procedure room located within or adjacent to a surgeon’s practice, independent of a hospital or ambulatory surgical center.3 It requires no anesthesia provider, no patient monitoring, and no postanesthesia care unit. Patients arrive, undergo the procedure, and leave, often comparing the experience to that of a dental visit. This model, backed by evidence-based safety data, is becoming a preferred option for appropriately selected patients across various specialties. From the patient’s perspective, the benefits are transformative. OBS eliminates many traditional surgical burdens: no fasting, no need for medical clearance, and no requirement for patient gowning or intravenous access. Anxiety is reduced, and recovery is faster and more autonomous. Patients remain alert and engaged, able to provide intraoperative feedback and enjoy music, conversation, or virtual reality during surgery. Sedation issues such as nausea, dizziness, or urinary retention are avoided, and opioid consumption is lower. OBS fosters shared decision-making and encourages patients to take ownership of their recovery process. For surgeons, office surgery offers workflow advantages that directly improve quality of life and professional autonomy. Scheduling becomes more flexible and predictable. Administrative burdens lessen. Office staff, trained in a narrow scope of procedures, develop high levels of efficiency and teamwork. The office surgical suite decompresses burdened operating rooms, reducing after-hour cases and allowing surgeons to reclaim time without compromising care.4 Facilities also benefit from cost savings. With fewer staff, minimal instrumentation, reduced waste, and simplified sterilization protocols (eg, field sterility), OBS is leaner and more sustainable.5 Wide-awake local anesthesia alone can reduce case time by over an hour. When combined with OBS efficiencies, the throughput increases significantly while improving margins. From a societal perspective, OBS enhances access to care, especially for geriatric patients and those with transportation or mobility challenges. Surgery can be performed on the same day it is indicated, shortening wait times and alleviating backlogs. Environmentally, the model reduces carbon footprint through less staff travel, waste, and resource use. Despite its many advantages, surgeons have to be aware of potential drawbacks, including vasovagal response and epinephrine rush, both of which can be mitigated with adequate preparation. Barriers to widespread adoption remain. Surgeons may be hesitant to step away from ingrained routines, and institutions may be financially tied to operating room–based models. Launching a successful OBS program requires space, training, compliance, and administrative buy-in—but the long-term benefits justify the effort. In conclusion, office surgery is a forward leap in surgical practice. As healthcare shifts toward value-based care, we believe OBS will emerge as the new standard for many procedures, offering high-quality outcomes at lower costs, with unmatched patient experience. DISCLOSURES The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. Dr. Lalonde receives book royalties from Thieme Medical Publishers and serves as a consultant for ASSI instruments. Dr. Shafic Sraj has ownership in Office Surgical Services LLC, a consulting business.
Sraj et al. (Sun,) studied this question.