CIED readmissions within 180 days were earlier after aortic valve interventions and higher after TAVR than SAVR, but rates were similar for surgical vs percutaneous mitral interventions.
Does the type of valve intervention affect the incidence and timing of 180-day readmission for CIED implantation in patients undergoing aortic or mitral valve procedures?
The incidence and timing of readmission for CIED implantation within 6 months vary significantly depending on the type of valve intervention, which should guide post-discharge rhythm monitoring.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Readmissions with CIED implantation within the first 6 months post-procedure occur earlier following aortic valve compared to mitral valve interventions. Whereas the incidence of readmission for CIED implantation was higher with TAVR compared to SAVR, readmission rates for CIED implantation were comparable over the first 6 months following surgical and percutaneous mitral interventions. These data have implications for the timing and duration of rhythm monitoring after discharge following valve interventions.
Furman et al. (Sun,) reported a other. CIED readmissions within 180 days were earlier after aortic valve interventions and higher after TAVR than SAVR, but rates were similar for surgical vs percutaneous mitral interventions.