Abstract Bayesian optimization (BO) holds promise for accelerating materials science research; however, it faces challenges with high-dimensional inputs and experimental noise in real-world problems. This study addresses these issues by benchmarking batch BO on two synthetic six-variable optimization tasks at varying noise levels: a needle-in-a-haystack task (Ackley function) representing rare materials properties, and a smooth landscape (Hartmann function) simulating process optimization. We evaluate key BO strategies, including acquisition functions, batch-picking methods, and exploration hyperparameter tuning, while presenting a framework for tracking high-dimensional optimization progress. Results show optimization outcomes are highly sensitive to noise levels and landscape shapes. This information enables the design of robust materials optimization campaigns with pre-planned experimental budgets that account for real-world uncertainties. Our methodology facilitates greater BO utilization in experimental materials research, particularly for multi-variable optimization problems, by providing practical guidance for configuring BO campaigns in challenging scientific applications. Graphical abstract
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Imon Mia
The University of Texas at Dallas
Armi Tiihonen
Espoo Music Institute
Anna Ernst
Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The University of Texas at Dallas
Aalto University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mia et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286600a974eb0d3c013b0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-026-01803-y
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: