The authors regret that a figure reference was unintentionally lost in the “Results and Discussions” section. Specifically, the sentence: “These metrics were computed on the test set for each trained ML model, as shown in Errore. L'origine riferimento non è stata trovata .” incorrectly displays a broken reference. The correct reference should read: “...as shown in Fig. 3.” As a consequence of this reference shift, the numbering of two figures was inadvertently inverted. The figure with the caption “Plot of the three ML models on the data of Campaign 3” should be labeled as Fig. 3, while the figure with the caption “Calibration plot for the test data.” should be labeled as Fig. 4. Accordingly, the sentence: “In addition, Fig. 3 displays the calibration plot which illustrates the level of confidence or uncertainty in the model by comparing observed and predicted values” should be corrected to: “In addition, Fig. 4 displays the calibration plot which illustrates the level of confidence or uncertainty in the model by comparing observed and predicted values.” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Ferrisi et al. (Thu,) studied this question.