This paper introduces contract reproducibility as a refutation-only, artifact-level criterion for validation-only systems. Unlike bitwise reproducibility, which compares binary outputs under identical builds and environments, contract reproducibility compares normative results extracted from evidence artifacts produced by validators claiming the same contract identity. The criterion explicitly rejects correctness, safety, compliance, trust, or system-level guarantees. Agreement carries no positive epistemic weight. Only divergence under fixed contract identity and canonical input refutes a conformance claim. The paper formalizes contract identity, canonical input identity, and normative result tuples, defines strict preconditions, and demonstrates that reproducibility is a property of declared contracts and observable artifacts, not of implementations or systems. This work is intended for auditability, dispute resolution, and integrity-critical validation contexts where falsification of false process claims is required without implying correctness.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
O. A. Surkov
Indrashil University
Indrashil University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
O. A. Surkov (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75cc6c6e9836116a25ef4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18402934