• A data collection and organization methodology is proposed for benchmarking drinking water facilities across five regions in New Jersey. • Energy and carbon intensity metrics are calculated to compare regional performance. • The influences of the population density, terrain and applied treatment technologies on energy consumption are explored. Energy use in drinking water system varies significantly across utilities due to differences in operating conditions, and system configuration, posing challenges for consistent energy benchmarking. In this study, we present data collection, alignment and benchmarking approach based on a long-term operational data set from a water utility company operated in five geographical regions in New Jersey. The framework enabled quantification and comparison of total energy consumption and water production, across raw water, treatment and finished water facilities. The total energy and carbon intensity metrics were calculated using the aligned dataset supporting the comparative benchmarking approach.. Energy and carbon intensities were calculated for all regions combined, by region, and by specific function of drinking water facilities, resulting in overall averages of 0.7 kWh/m³ and 0.24 kg CO 2 e/m 3 , respectively. Additionally, this study highlights that factors such as topography, applied treatment technologies and the spatial distribution of water consumers are positively correlated with energy requirements for pumping and treatment.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Amna A.M. Bashir
William Riddell
Jagadish Torlapati
Energy Nexus
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Rowan University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bashir et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a760d0c6e9836116a2dea9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2026.100645
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: