Embodied carbon, time and cost of two post-office buildings: Comparison of 3D printed concrete and conventional buildings

Key Points

• Embodied carbon in 3D printed concrete structures was significantly lower than in conventional buildings, impacting sustainability.
• The analysis revealed a 25% reduction in construction time for 3D printed buildings compared to traditional methods.
• Cost assessment showed that 3D printing can potentially be more economical over time due to reduced labor and material expenses.
• Findings suggest that integrating 3D printing in construction could help mitigate climate change by lowering carbon emissions.