Methodological quality of systematic reviews on the erector spinae plane block: A systematic review

Key Points

• This analysis shows significant variability in the methodological quality of systematic reviews on the erector spinae plane block, highlighting potential biases.
• The review evaluated 15 systematic reviews, revealing low adherence to established methodological guidelines for effective intervention reporting.
• Observational analysis across various databases indicated the need for more rigorous standards in conducting systematic reviews in this area.
• Improved methodological quality may enhance the reliability of findings related to the erector spinae plane block, affecting clinical practice.