The concept of secular terrorism concerns not only criminal activities but also the moral reasoning processes that allow individuals to legitimize violence and morally reprehensible acts. Drawing from criminological and forensic psychology theories and through a life-narrative interview with a former Italian militant, this research explores how ideals, when distorted, can lead to extreme acts of violence. The study begins by highlighting the strategies proposed by criminologists which allow individuals to commit crimes while maintaining a sense of moral legitimacy. A central focus of this research is perverted idealism. The diverse nature of perverted ideals within different extremist movements is explored through the incorporation of insights from an interview with a former militant. From a forensic perspective, the case provides insight into the assessment of ideological offenders, helping to distinguish ideological motivation from psychopathological compulsion and to understand how moral absolutism shapes criminal accountability. The narrative reveals the complex interplay of personal beliefs, duty, and political motivations that fueled actions and highlights the lasting impact of perverted idealism. The study concludes by emphasizing the role of injustice as a fundamental motivator for terrorism and criminal acts. Individuals often perceive themselves as champions of justice, even when their actions result in violence. This research sheds light on the intricate relationship between ideals, justice, and the darker aspects of human behavior, urging us to consider the profound consequences of perverted idealism in society. • Perverted idealism frames violence as a duty, not only as guilt-neutralized wrongdoing. • A life-narrative case illustrates duty-based moralization in secular terrorism. • The case informs medico-legal appraisal of ideology versus psychopathology. • Narrative markers may support risk formulation and rehabilitation planning.
Franceschetti et al. (Wed,) studied this question.