Abstract Purpose Develop and explicate a concise triadic model of legal socialization that includes legal cognition, legal emotion and legal motivation and examine how these dimensions interact within Chinese and Western perspectives to produce stable, internalized legal compliance. Methods Integrative theoretical synthesis and comparative review of cross‐cultural literature (procedural justice, developmental psychology, and Chinese and Western legal socialization traditions). From this synthesis, a conceptual framework and three testable propositions about cognition, emotion and motivation are derived. Results The model yields three principal findings: (1) legal cognition (knowledge of and endorsement for legal norms) is necessary but not sufficient for internalization; (2) positive legal emotion, shaped by experiences of procedural fairness and interpersonal relationships, mediates the conversion of cognitive endorsement into intrinsic legal motivation rather than mere external obedience; (3) stable legal socialization arises when emotional resonance strengthens intrinsic motivation and when institutional practices and social environments (e.g. fair decision‐making, trusted authorities, supportive networks) sustain that motivation. The framework also identifies relational experiences as important contextual moderators. Conclusions Embedding cognition–emotion–motivation processes within institutional and relational contexts provides a psychologically grounded, culturally sensitive account of legal socialization. The triadic model generates clear hypotheses for longitudinal and experimental tests and suggests policy and educational interventions that prioritize procedural fairness and relational trust to promote internalized compliance.
Shuhui Xu (Mon,) studied this question.