AFM-suggested fluid challenges increased in effectiveness to 70% compared to 51% for clinician-initiated challenges, indicating improved physiological response with experience over time.
Observational (n=59)
No
Does progressive clinical experience with AI-assisted fluid management improve the physiological effectiveness of intraoperative fluid challenges in patients undergoing major abdominal oncologic surgery?
Progressive integration of AI-assisted fluid management into routine practice is associated with a learning curve that improves the physiological effectiveness of intraoperative fluid challenges.
Absolute Event Rate: 70% vs 51%
p-value: p=<0.001
Progressive integration of AFM into routine anesthetic practice was associated with measurable changes in clinician behavior and improved physiological effectiveness of intraoperative fluid challenges over time, consistent with a learning curve effect. These findings support the role of AI-based decision support systems in promoting more consistent and physiologically targeted fluid management and provide a foundation for future prospective studies evaluating their impact on clinical outcomes.
Pasta et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in major abdominal oncologic surgery (n=59). Assisted Fluid Management (AFM) vs. Clinician-initiated fluid management was evaluated on Effectiveness of fluid challenges (p=<0.001). AFM-suggested fluid challenges increased in effectiveness to 70% compared to 51% for clinician-initiated challenges, indicating improved physiological response with experience over time.