Public involvement in research is advocated by research authorities and funding bodies worldwide. In the United Kingdom (UK), it is considered achievable and expected in all types of health and social care research. However, lived-experience involvement in prison and forensic mental health research remains rare. This qualitative study reports the experiences of National Health Service (NHS) staff, probation staff, and people with lived experience collaborating in a unique research group within a secure mental health setting in England. Qualitative interviews were undertaken with six staff and four lived-experience researchers. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied, supported by NVivo software. Two themes were identified: Relationship Matters and This Feels Valuable , each with two subthemes: Balancing the Scales and Safe and Secure ; and C ollaboration Improves Our Research, but It's Challenging and Personal and Professional Growth . This study provides evidence that collaborative research can benefit forensic mental health settings and outlines factors that contributed to positive experiences for the researchers. There was lived-experience involvement throughout this study.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rosie Rutherford
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust
Susannah Pashley
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust
Daniel Heggs
Cardiff Metropolitan University
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Cardiff Metropolitan University
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rutherford et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac4d02a1e69014ccdefb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14999013261425674
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: