The transformation of the labor market driven by digital technology has profoundly affected workers’ income. Based on data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) 2014–2022 and the China Labor-force Dynamic Survey (CLDS) 2012–2018, this paper systematically examines the causal effects of standard employment, traditional non-standard employment (labor dispatch), and new non-standard employment (non-contract employment) on income within a unified framework. This study adopts a progressive identification strategy combining the two-way fixed-effects model, individual fixed-effects model, and event study methodology. The findings are as follows: First, new non-standard employment exhibits a significant “income penalty” effect, with its wage level being 14–15% lower than that of standard employment. This effect remains robust after controlling for individual heterogeneity. Second, dynamic analysis shows that transitioning from standard employment to new non-standard employment leads to sustained income loss, with a decline of nearly 10.8% after four years. Third, mechanism testing reveals that workers increase part-time work to compensate for income loss, but job satisfaction significantly declines, leading to a dual dilemma of “exchanging time for income” and “welfare discount.” Fourth, heterogeneity analysis shows that less educated and rural workers suffer greater shocks. The study concludes that new non-standard employment has inherent income suppression characteristics, and its effects are persistent and heterogeneous. It calls for the improvement of a labor rights protection system that adapts to new forms of employment, as well as the implementation of targeted support policies for vulnerable groups, in order to build a more equitable and secure labor market.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fancheng Meng (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba425c4e9516ffd37a2913 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14030094
Fancheng Meng
Tarim University
Economies
Tarim University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: