“Punishing Evil” and “Supplementing Confucianism”: The Intellectual Interaction Between the Jesuits and Wang Yangming’s School in the Late Ming Period

The intellectual exchanges between late-Ming Jesuits and Chinese literati have long been interpreted primarily as a process of cultural accommodation aimed at “harmonizing with Confucianism” (合儒), and scholarship has tended to focus on missionary strategies, social networks, or individual conversion histories. By contrast, the question of how resources within Confucian thought made ethical dialogue with Catholicism possible—especially why the practical-learning strand (實學派) of Wang Yangming’s School (陽明學) exhibited such pronounced receptivity to Catholic ideas among late-Ming literati—remains insufficiently theorized at the level of conceptual structure. This study, therefore, shifts the analytical focus from “historical narratives of converts” to an explanation of the mechanisms that enabled Sino-Jesuit dialogue. It argues that Augustine and Wang Yangming display a notable convergence in their conceptions of good and evil (善惡論), and that this convergence created an intellectual space for engagement between Jesuits and later Yangming scholars. The Jesuits’ deliberate promotion of doctrines concerning the punishment of evil (懲惡) further facilitated the practical-learning Yangmingists’ reception of Catholic resources regarding ultimate judgment and retributive justice, especially as they confronted the problem of inadequate means to restrain or punish wrongdoing. This article situates late-Ming Sino-Western intellectual exchange within an analytical framework of “theories of good and evil—mechanisms for punishing evil—pathways for supplementing Confucianism (補儒),” thereby offering a mechanism-based explanation, grounded in theories of good and evil, for the historical interaction between Chinese Confucian thought and the ethical systems of incoming religions.