Introduction: Coping strategies are essential for first responders in Nepal as they face disaster-related challenges. This study explores differences in coping mechanisms between professional and community-trained responders, aiming to assess the impact of formal training on their resilience and effectiveness in crises. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey conducted in Kathmandu, Nepal, from nationwide participants from various districts. Participants included 30 professionals and 30 community first responders. The COPE (Coping Orientation to Problem Experienced) tool, translated into Nepali, measured coping strategies over 15 domains. Data collection methods included paper-based, computer-based, mobile apps, or online surveys. Results: A total of 60 first responders participated, with a mean age of 34.85 years; most were aged 21-30 (43.3%) and 31- 40 (26.67%). Community responders reported higher levels of religious coping (mean score 13.4), planning (14.4), and instrumental social support (13.3). In contrast, professional responders exhibited greater use of acceptance (11), denial (7.1), and mental disengagement (9.5). Both groups reported similar levels of venting (9.8). Conclusion: The study reveals distinct coping strategies between professional and community-trained first responders, with professionals favoring acceptance and denial, and community responders preferring religious coping and planning. These findings suggest the need for tailored support, though generalizations should be approached cautiously due to potential bias and limited sample size.
Maharjan et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: