The research conducted in this paper is a practical example of the Design of Experiments methodology. In accordance with the assumptions of the experimental design, the authors drew attention to the problem: how should the spark plasma sintering process be planned to obtain the maximum amount of information needed to optimise the consolidation of the WC-6Co composite at the lowest possible cost? The DOE methodology—a powerful technique for investigating new processes and gaining knowledge about existing ones in order to optimise them for high performance—was employed in the study. The aim of the research was to optimise the consolidation of the spark-plasma sintering process of the WC-6Co composite using the DoE (Design of Experiments) methodology. Four sintering factors were selected for the study: sintering temperature (factor A, 1300–1400 °C); heating rate (factor B, 100–300 °C/min); sintering time (factor C, 150–600 s); and pressure (factor D, 40–50 MPa). Each consolidation factor was designed to cover three levels. The L9 orthogonal array was used. It was found that sintering temperature and heating rate had the greatest impact on apparent density. To validate the statistical model, sintering tests were performed at a temperature of 1380 °C, a heating rate of 100 °C/min, a sintering time of 150 s and a pressing pressure of 45 MPa. Validation analysis of the statistical model demonstrated consistency with the experimental results. The WC-6Co composite achieved an apparent density of 14.85 g/cm3, corresponding to 97.42% of the theoretical density, with a hardness of 1809 HV30 and total porosity of 2.583%. X-ray diffraction studies revealed the presence of tungsten carbide and cobalt in the structure.
Kruzel et al. (Tue,) studied this question.