What question did this study set out to answer?

March 28, 2026Open Access

Efficacy and safety of clipping prior to cyanoacrylate embolization in gastric varices: a single-arm systematic review and meta-analysis

Key Points

The central aim is to assess the safety and effectiveness of clip-assisted cyanoacrylate injection in managing gastric variceal bleeding.
Conducted a systematic search on multiple databases
Evaluated studies adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines
Included six studies with a total of 465 participants
Performed meta-analysis using a random-effects model
Pooled technical success rate of 99%
Rebleeding occurred in 11% of cases
Adverse events observed in 20% of participants
Ectopic embolism occurred in 3% of cases
Overall mortality rate was 4%

Abstract

Gastric variceal bleeding is a life-threatening complication of portal hypertension. Cyanoacrylate injection is the standard endoscopic treatment that carries a significant risk of ectopic embolization, particularly in patients with gastrorenal shunts. Adding endoscopic clips before injection may enhance safety and efficacy, yet evidence remains limited. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of clip-assisted cyanoacrylate injection (clip-ECI). A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library on October 9, 2025, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251166002). The primary outcome was rebleeding. Secondary outcomes included technical success, adverse events, ectopic embolism, and procedure-related mortality. Meta-analysis was performed using R version 3.4.3 (R Core Team) with a random-effects model expressed as proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Six studies involving 465 participants treated with clip-ECI were included, four in the meta-analysis due to overlapping populations. Most participants were middle-aged males with cirrhosis from hepatitis B, presenting with GOV2 or IGV1 gastric varices; 41.7–100% had gastrorenal shunts. The pooled technical success rate was 99% (95% CI 0.97–1.0; p = 0.97; I2 = 0%), rebleeding 11% (95% CI 0.08–0.16; p = 0.1; I2 = 50.4%), adverse events 20% (95% CI 0.15–0.26; p = 0.37; I2 = 0%), ectopic embolism 3% (95% CI 0.00–0.37; p = 0.01; I2 = 85.1%), deaths attributable to ectopic embolism 1% (95% CI 0.00–0.04; p = 0.67; I2 = 0%) and overall mortality 4% (95% CI 0.01–0.14; p = 0.01; I2 = 80.6%). Compared with conventional injection, clip-ECI showed fewer embolic complications and a non-significant trend toward lower rebleeding. Clip-ECI appears highly effective with low rebleeding and embolic complication rates, supporting its safety for gastric varices, particularly in patients with gastrorenal shunts. Large multicenter randomized trials are needed to strengthen these findings and establish clinical protocols.

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Murga et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c76fff8bbfbc51511e05d2 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-12667-y

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Bookmark

View Full Paper