A considerable amount of the knowledge produced by qualitative research is constructed with the use of interview methods. In this methodological space, interview location is largely discussed pragmatically, reduced to a technical consideration for the data collection stage. Subsequently, the methodological importance of interview location is underexplored, and the generative potential of different interview sites undertheorised. This article draws on empirical work conducted in the field of criminology as an exemplar to inform other qualitative researchers in the social sciences – particularly those interested in narrative methodologies. Utilising conceptualisations of ‘space’ and ‘place’ the article illustrates how different locations influence the richness and depth of participant storytelling, and facilitate or inhibit the construction of spatially specific narrative identities. The contribution this makes is twofold. First, the article illustrates how conceptualising interview location as part of the methodological and analytical process enables the researcher to take seriously its role in the production of knowledge, contributing to the overall transparency and rigour of the research. Second, the article demonstrates how conceptualising participant safety in different spaces as having emotional and psychological dimensions enhances ethical practice for narrative work in particular.
Nicola A. Collett (Wed,) studied this question.