Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is a widely available alternative fuel, easily stored in liquid form, capable of displacing diesel fuel in compression-ignition engines. Bio-LPG extends this pathway because it is a renewable drop-in form of LPG; its distinguishing advantage is not a different in-cylinder combustion chemistry, but a lower life-cycle greenhouse-gas intensity that depends on feedstock and production route. This review, therefore, combines a systematic synthesis of CI-engine LPG combustion evidence with a Bio-LPG transition perspective. A PRISMA-guided search of major databases (2000–2025) yielded 47 studies with matched diesel baseline. Evidence was categorized by LPG utilization pathway, distinguishing between fumigation, gaseous port injection, and in-cylinder LPG direct injection (gaseous or liquid), alongside engine class, pilot fuel fraction, and key operating parameters (injection timing/quantity, intake conditioning, exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), and boost). Data were normalized as percentage deviations relative to diesel and synthesized across standardized load bins (25/50/75/100%). Among studies reporting nitrogen oxides (NOx), 20 of 37 showed net reductions, while results in 12 studies were load-dependent; particulate matter (PM), smoke, and soot indicators decreased in 17 of 27 cases. While intake-path strategies generally reduced NOx and smoke, they often increased CO and HC emissions at low loads. The limited emerging liquid-phase direct-injection evidence shows the closest diesel-like efficiency response, although the evidence base remains limited. Overall, the engine-level findings identify the most promising LPG/Bio-LPG deployment pathways, while the specific additional climate benefit of Bio-LPG lies in its lower well-to-wheel greenhouse-gas intensity.
Percembli et al. (Wed,) studied this question.