This paper presents the results of calculations of the shell-side heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop for a shell-and-tube heat exchanger with an inner shell diameter of 200.2 mm and an effective tube length of 518 mm. The exchanger contained 85 copper tubes (12/10 mm), arranged in a staggered layout with a pitch ratio of 1.5. It was equipped with nine segmental baffles, with a 25% baffle cut and a baffle spacing of 48 mm. The inlet temperature of the hot water flowing through the shell, and the mass flow rate, were varied in the ranges of 35–79 °C and 1–3 kg/s, respectively. The calculations were performed using the extended Bell–Delaware method, the VDI (Gaddis–Gnielinski) method, and the Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating. CFD simulations were performed using the OpenFOAM and Ansys Fluent software packages. The calculated results were then compared with the available experimental data. The findings showed that the VDI method generated the greatest overestimation of the heat transfer coefficient and underestimated the pressure drop, whereas the extended Bell–Delaware method demonstrated the highest agreement with the experimental data.
Cieśliński et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: