Effect of heat stress during early, late, and entire dry period on dairy cattle

Cooling during the entire dry period abates the negative effects of heat stress postpartum, yet the temporal relationship of cooling (i.e., early or late dry period) to performance is unknown. We evaluated the effect of heat stress early, late, and for the entire dry period on subsequent performance. Cows were selected based on mature-equivalent milk yield and dried off 45 d before expected calving. Cows were blocked by parity, previous 305-d mature equivalent milk yield, and body weight (BW) and randomly assigned to cooling (shade, fans, and soakers; CL) or heat stress (shade; HT). Treatments included CL (n = 20) or HT (n = 18) during the entire dry period, HT during the first 3 wk dry and then CL until calving (HTCL, n = 21), or CL during the first 3 wk dry period and then HT until calving (CLHT, n = 19). Heat stress increased rectal temperature (RT; CL, 38.8; HT, 39.1 ± 0.04°C) and respiration rate (RR; CL, 52.9; HT, 70.5 ± 1.9 breaths/min) during the early dry period. In the late dry period, HT increased RT and RR relative to CL cows (RT = CL, 38.7; HT, 39.1; CLHT, 39.1; HTCL, 38.9 ± 0.05°C; RR = CL, 47; HT, 64; CLHT, 66; HTCL, 53 ± 2.1 breaths/min). During the early dry period, HT decreased dry matter intake (CL, 11.8; HT, 10.5 ± 0.35 kg/d) but dry matter intake did not differ among treatments during late dry period (HT, 10.7; HTCL, 11.1; CL, 11.2; CLHT, 10.1 ± 0.55 kg/d). Cows exposed to prepartum cooling during the entire dry period had increased dry matter intake compared with cows exposed to heat stress during the late dry period (CL vs. CLHT, 11.2 ± 0.55 and 10.1 ± 0.55 kg/d, respectively). Heat stress at any time reduced gestation length compared with cows under prepartum cooling during the entire dry period (CL, 277 vs. HT, 274; CLHT, 273; and HTCL, 274 ± 1.17 d). Dry period length decreased by approximately 4 d if cows were exposed to HT at any time. During the early dry period, HT decreased BW, whereas CL increased BW relative to that at dry-off (CL, 6.9; HT, -9.4 ± 3.7 kg). In the late dry period, we detected no differences in BW gain among treatments, but cows exposed to prepartum cooling for the entire dry period tended to have increased BW gain compared with HT and HTCL. Prepartum cooling during the early or late dry period alone partially rescued milk yield only in the first 3 wk of lactation (CL, 32.9; HT, 26.6; CLHT, 29.7; HTCL, 30.7 ± 1.37 kg/d). Cooling for the entire dry period increased milk yield up to 30 wk into lactation compared with all other treatments. Thus, HT at any time during the dry period compromises performance of cows after calving.