Nonclinical sample (N = 649)
Spanish version of the Short Depressive Rumination Scale (SDRS)
Psychometric properties including Confirmatory Factor Analysis, internal consistency, and criterion validity
The Spanish version of the Short Depressive Rumination Scale is a reliable and valid 4-item tool for rapid assessment of depressive rumination in community samples.
Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is considered a transdiagnostic variable underlying common symptoms (e.g., depressed mood) across various mood disorders. Depressive rumination is one typical and frequent manifestation of RNT and is a well-known vulnerability factor of depression onset, maintenance and recurrence. Due to the time-related constraints in assessment settings and the association of rumination on sadness with diagnosis of depression, the rapid identification of individuals scoring high on this construct may become a useful screening tool in non-clinical samples. The main aim of the present study was to test the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Short Depressive Rumination Scale (SDRS) in a large sample (N = 649). Confirmatory Factor Analysis supported a one-factor model accounting for 75% of variance with an excellent internal consistency (α = .93) in spite of the reduced number of items (4 items). Criterion validity results based on associations with other well-established rumination (sub)scales, age, scores in depression and gender differences, were congruent. The results suggest that the SDRS, the shortest existing scale assessing depressive rumination to our knowledge, can be a useful instrument for a rapid assessment of depressive rumination in community samples.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jorge J. Ricarte
Fundacion Allende
Eva Aizpurúa
Twitter (United States)
Laura Ros
University of Castilla-La Mancha
The Spanish Journal of Psychology
KU Leuven
Trinity College Dublin
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ricarte et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69daa94384371aa676a3daeb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.35
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: