Background/Objectives: The medial meniscus is crucial for load transmission and knee stability. Meniscal tears disrupt joint biomechanics, increasing the risk of cartilage degeneration. However, few studies have quantitatively compared how different tear types affect stress and contact mechanics using finite element analysis (FEA). This study aims to analyze stress distributions for various meniscal tear types and develop a predictive model for meniscal stress behavior. This study investigates how stress distributions differ between healthy and torn medial menisci under identical loading conditions. The study examines which meniscal tear type produces the highest stress concentrations. The effects of different tear types on penetration, gap formation, pressure distribution, and sliding distance at the meniscus interface are also analysed. Materials and Methods: The FEA model of the knee joint, including femoral and tibial cartilage and the medial meniscus, was developed. Simulations were conducted for a healthy meniscus and for menisci with radial, horizontal and complex tears. Stress, penetration, gap, pressure, and sliding distance were calculated, and a mathematical model describing their relationships was established. Results: All torn menisci exhibited significantly higher stresses than the healthy meniscus (p 0.9). In a healthy meniscus, stress distribution is homogeneous (≈26 MPa). Stress concentration increases depending on the tear type: limited in a horizontal tear (≈26.5 MPa), significant in a vertical tear (≈30.8 MPa), and highest in a radial tear (≈40.6 MPa). These results indicate that as the tear progresses, the load-bearing capacity of the meniscus decreases, and stresses concentrate at the tear edges. Conclusions: Meniscal tears, especially radial ones, substantially alter knee biomechanics and elevate tissue stress. These biomechanical insights highlight the importance of early diagnosis and targeted rehabilitation strategies to prevent further cartilage damage and osteoarthritis progression.
Kurt et al. (Fri,) studied this question.