What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of nasotracheal and orotracheal intubation in critically ill patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

April 14, 2026Open Access

Nasotracheal Versus Orotracheal Intubation in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study

Key Points

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of nasotracheal and orotracheal intubation in critically ill patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
Conducted a retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study.
Enrolled 45 COVID-19 patients who underwent nasotracheal intubation and matched with 45 controls receiving orotracheal intubation.
Recorded data on sedative, analgesic, NMBA usage, tracheotomy incidence, intubation complications, and ICU stay length.
Performed multivariable logistic regression to assess associations.
Patients undergoing nasotracheal intubation required significantly less sedative, analgesic, and NMBA compared to orotracheal intubation.
Tracheotomy incidence was lower in the nasotracheal group (6.7% vs. 26.7%).
Multivariable analysis indicated that nasotracheal intubation reduced tracheotomy risk (adjusted OR = 0.19).
Oral ulcer incidence was also lower in the nasotracheal group.

Abstract

Yan-Ling Zhang,1,2 Hai-Ding Zou,1,2 Ru-Ping Dai,1,2 Ru-Yi Luo1,2 1Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Peopleâs Republic of China; 2Anesthesia Medical Research Center, Central South University, Changsha, Peopleâs Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Ru-Yi Luo, Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Central Ren-Min Road No. 139, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, Peopleâs Republic of China, Email luoruyi@csu.edu.cnBackground: This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of nasotracheal intubation (NTI) versus orotracheal intubation (OTI) in severe COVID-19 pneumonia patients requiring mechanical ventilation.Methods: In this retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study, we consecutively enrolled 45 critically ill adults with COVID-19 who underwent NTI. These patients were matched 1:1 by age and sex with 45 controls who received OTI. Data on sedative, analgesic, and neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) usage, tracheotomy incidence, intubation-related complications, and ICU length of stay were extracted from medical records. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the independent association between intubation route and tracheotomy risk.Results: Patients in the NTI group had significantly lower requirements for continuous infusion of sedatives, analgesics, and NMBAs compared with the OTI group (all P < 0.001). The incidence of tracheotomy was significantly lower in the NTI group (6.7% vs. 26.7%, P = 0.011). Multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, sex, BMI, PaO2/FiO2, and SOFA score confirmed that NTI was independently associated with a reduced risk of tracheotomy (adjusted OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04â 0.78, P = 0.022). The incidence of oral ulcers was lower (P = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in other complications, including ventilator-associated pneumonia.Conclusion: In this retrospective study of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, NTI was associated with reduced sedative, analgesic, and NMBA requirements, a lower risk of tracheotomy, and fewer oral complications, without increasing other major adverse events. Given the observational design, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating, and prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm causality.Keywords: airway management, nasotracheal intubation, orotracheal intubation, severe COVID-19 pneumonia

Perguntar à IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddd8eee195c95cdefd6770 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s588399

Perguntar à IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper