Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The accuracy of structural model parameter estimates in latent variable mixture modeling was explored with a 3 (sample size) × 3 (exogenous latent mean difference) × 3 (endogenous latent mean difference) × 3 (correlation between factors) × 3 (mixture proportions) factorial design. In addition, the efficacy of several likelihood-based statistics (Akaike's Information Criterion AIC, Bayesian Information Ctriterion BIC, the sample-size adjusted BIC ssBIC, the consistent AIC CAIC, the Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio test aVLMR), classification-based statistics (CLC classification likelihood information criterion, ICL-BIC integrated classification likelihood, normalized entropy criterion NEC, entropy), and distributional statistics (multivariate skew and kurtosis test) were examined to determine which statistics best recover the correct number of components. Results indicate that the structural parameters were recovered, but the model fit statistics were not exceedingly accurate. The ssBIC statistic was the most accurate statistic, and the CLC, ICL-BIC, and aVLMR showed limited utility. However, none of these statistics were accurate for small samples (n = 500).
Henson et al. (Tue,) studied this question.