Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Minor bug fixes and small new features. What's Changed Fix how the species fluxes are summed by @d-montgomery in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/607 fix species flux summing so final Dnp1 isnt double counted by @baperry2 in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/609 Bump Submodules/PelePhysics from 60716de to d9c1335 by @dependabotbot in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/610 Assert a vector is not empty to avoid potential null pointer deference warning by @jrood-nrel in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/611 give option to specify custom chemistryₘodel paths by @baperry2 in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/612 Add useful GNUmakefile flags to Controls in docs by @d-montgomery in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/613 Update linear solvers controls in docs by @d-montgomery in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/614 Changes to compile for single precision by @jrood-nrel in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/616 Add stationary reference frame option for FlameSheet by @baperry2 in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/590 Relaxing streamSynchronize locations by @ThomasHowarth in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/595 add capability option for single output prefix across all output types by @baperry2 in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/617 Bump Submodules/AMReX-Hydro from 756c76a to 75da770 by @dependabotbot in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/618 git ignore. visit files by @baperry2 in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/620 Initialize dt when restarting from plt by @d-montgomery in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/623 Bpatch feature extension to include manifold variables by @SreejithNREL in https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/pull/622 Full Changelog: https: //github. com/AMReX-Combustion/PeleLMeX/compare/v1. 1. 3. . . v1. 1. 4
Esclapez et al. (Tue,) studied this question.