PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 21, 2000Organic Process Research & Development685 citations

Dealing with the Impact of Ritonavir Polymorphs on the Late Stages of Bulk Drug Process Development

View Full Paper
SCSanjay R. ChemburkarJBJohn F. BauerKDKris C. Deming

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Ritonavir (Kempf, D. J.; Marsh, K. C., Denissen, J. F.; McDonald, E.; Vasavanonda, S.; Flentge, C. A.; Green, B. E.; Fino, L.; Park, C. H.; Kong, X. P.; Wideburg, N. E.; Saldivar, A.; Ruitz, L.; Kati, W. M.; Sham, H. L.; Robins, T.; Stewart, K. D.; Hsu, A.; Plattner, J. J.; Leonard, J. M.; Norbeck, D. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 2484) is Abbott's novel protease inhibitor, for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the causative organism of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). It is marketed as Norvir. From the discovery of ritonavir until the new drug application (NDA) filing, only one crystalline form was known to exist. Attempts to identify other possible crystal forms were unsuccessful. Two years after the launch of Norvir to the market, some lots of Norvir capsules failed a dissolution specification. Investigation of this phenomena revealed the existence of a crystal form of ritonavir other than the one already known (Form I). This new crystal form was designated as Form II. The two crystal forms are polymorphs and differ substantially in their physical properties such as solubility. In this article, we will discuss the challenges these polymorphs created for the bulk drug substance as well as for the formulation, and how we dealt with these challenges.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chemburkar et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df225e3b0ba53fb37a1752https://doi.org/10.1021/op000023y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper