What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to assess how hypoxia and dissolved oxygen levels affect catch rates in a recreational groundfish fishery.

April 18, 2026Fisheries Oceanography0 citations

Effects of Dissolved Oxygen and Hypoxia on Catch Rates of Nearshore Groundfishes in a Recreational Hook and Line Fishery

LRLeif K. RasmusonOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife AWAlison D. WhitmanOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife BCBrandy T. Cervantes

Key Points

The aim is to assess how hypoxia and dissolved oxygen levels affect catch rates in a recreational groundfish fishery.
Analyzed dissolved oxygen (DO) data and recreational fishery catch data from Oregon coast (2018–2022)
Computed catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) and species encounter rates as functions of DO and regulatory bag limits
Categorized days based on hypoxic conditions (< 61 μmol/kg)
36.8% of analyzed days were hypoxic
Overall CPUE and species encounter rates declined during hypoxic periods
Some species showed increased CPUE at higher DO levels, while others were caught more during hypoxia
Increased pressure on vulnerable species suggests a need for adjusted fisheries management strategies

Abstract

ABSTRACT Global climate change is intensifying ocean deoxygenation, particularly in eastern boundary current systems such as the California Current. This study investigates the impact of hypoxic events on a nearshore, multispecies recreational groundfish fishery along the Oregon coast. Using dissolved oxygen (DO) data from the National Science Foundation's Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) Oregon Inshore Mooring (2018–2022, excluding 2020) and trip‐level recreational fishery catch data from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, we modeled catch‐per‐unit‐effort (CPUE) and species encounter rates as functions of DO and regulatory bag limits. Of the 709 days analyzed, 36.8% were characterized as hypoxic (DO < 61 μmol/kg). Of the 4 years, 2021 had the most severe hypoxia and 2019 had the least. Across all trips, CPUE and average number of species encountered generally declined during hypoxic periods, indicating reduced fishing success. However, species‐specific responses varied: some, such as blue/deacon and China rockfish, showed increased CPUE with higher DO levels, while others like cabezon and quillback rockfish were more frequently caught during hypoxic events. These patterns suggest that hypoxia alters species' availability and/or catchability, possibly due to shifts in fish behavior, vertical distribution, or tolerance to low DO. Notably, species with increased CPUE under hypoxia are already considered vulnerable or limiting for the Oregon recreational fishery, raising concerns about increased pressure on sensitive stocks. As hypoxic events become more frequent with climate change, incorporating DO metrics into stock assessments and fisheries management would improve population models for exploited species. Our findings highlight the need for fine‐scale, species‐specific approaches to recreational fisheries management in the context of changing ocean conditions and suggest that recreational fishers may face constraints in adapting to deoxygenation, especially in strongly place‐based or single‐species fisheries.

Perguntar à IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper