Literature reflects the society in various ways, acting as a mirror that captures both its triumphs and its deep-seated traumas. Displacement implies an identity crisis, a state of being where the self is untethered from its cultural and geographical moorings. Imperialism has a large role in the portrayal of the dislocation of people in different cultures in the past of the southern portion of the globe. Within this framework, partition narratives have become a part of displacement studies, a separate branch of study that focuses on the specific schism of 1947. When a nation is broken, the pain of going away from one’s own native land is not only a painful incident that influences the person mentally, but also extends to their generations. It has been used by many writers in the partition period, yet the female experiences remained largely ignored for decades. Partition has made unforgettable wounds on women physically, which remind them of the struggles, turning the female form into a literal battlefield for communal “honor.” Scholars like Urvashi Butalia, Nivedita Menon, and Kamla Bhasin have been extensively exploring the displacement of women in the context of partition. Their narratives focus on the traumatic experiences of displacement and how that reduces their identities to be merely considered as “bodies,” physical vessels for reproduction or objects of desecration rather than human beings with agency.
Vidyadhari et al. (Mon,) studied this question.