Geoheritage is commonly regarded as an important natural resource for tourism, but the latter can be a factor of risk to the former. A case study in the Western Caucasus, where the rural area of Mountainous Adygeya hosts many geosites (including those that are globally and nationally ranked), sheds light on a novel dimension of the aforementioned nexus, namely benefits to geoheritage from expansion of tourism infrastructure. The latter has grown remarkably in the study area during the past fifteen years. A comparison of 25 geosites as they were in 2010 and 2025 indicates their changes, which can be treated as positive and negative effects of the expansion of tourism infrastructure. Particularly, it is established that this expansion was responsible for the creation of one geosite, the extension of three previously existing geosites, the specialists’ awareness of an additional object, as well as for the improved accessibility of 12 geosites. Several negative effects are also documented, but they are neither major nor widespread due to the superb local environmental management. This example demonstrates that the rapid expansion of tourism infrastructure in rural, geoheritage-rich areas can contribute to their sustainability and not only challenges it.
Mikhailenko et al. (Tue,) studied this question.