Hydrogels have emerged as a crucial class of biomaterials for engineering 3D cellular microenvironments, playing a vital role in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Their tunable physicochemical properties, biocompatibility, and structural resemblance to the extracellular matrix (ECM) make them ideal candidates for bio-inks in 3D bioprinting applications. This manuscript comprehensively discusses the use of natural and synthetic polymers as foundational materials, along with hydrogel synthesis strategies, including crosslinking mechanisms and functionalization techniques, and their impact on bio-ink performance. The important physicochemical properties, such as swelling behavior, mechanical strength, degradation kinetics, and biological interactions (including cell viability, cytotoxicity, and immunogenicity), are critically analyzed in this work to understand their role in cellular responses and tissue formation. Factors influencing hydrogel synthesis, including polymer concentration, crosslinking density, and environmental conditions, are systematically discussed to optimize bio-ink formulations for diverse biomedical applications. Despite significant advancements, challenges such as poor mechanical stability, limited printability, and inadequate cell viability remain major hurdles in developing functional bio-inks. This review highlights recent advancements aimed at overcoming these limitations through nanocomposite hydrogels, smart (stimuli-responsive) bio-inks, and bioactive modifications. Furthermore, future perspectives on hydrogel-based bio-inks emphasize the need for multi-material printing, personalized biomaterials, emerging 4D printing technologies, and integration with biophysical and biochemical cues to create complex tissue constructs. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive insight into the design, challenges, and future potential of hydrogel-based bio-inks, fostering the development of next-generation biomaterials for advanced biomedical applications.
Parihar et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: