Background: Several clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (neoCIT) for patients with locally advanced oesophageal carcinoma have been reported recently, with promising anti-tumour efficacy. However, systematic evaluation of the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort is lacking. Objectives: This study aimed to describe the real-world treatment patterns and short- and long-term outcomes of neoCIT in patients with resected oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Design: A multicentre retrospective cohort study. Methods: Data from patients with resected ESCC who received neoCIT in routine clinical practice between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected from three tertiary centres in China. Results: A total of 324 consecutive patients were enrolled, and the majority (82.4%) received two cycles of neoCIT. In total, 225 patients achieved a radiographic partial response (PR), resulting in an objective response rate of 69.4%. The rates of minimally invasive oesophagectomy and radical resection were 71.9% and 98.5%, respectively. Fifty-nine patients (18.2%) experienced postoperative complications, and the most common complication was anastomotic leakage (10.2%). The pathological complete response and major pathological response rates were 27.2% and 37.0%, respectively. As of August 31, 2024, the median follow-up was 24.8 months. The estimated 3-year rates of disease-free survival and overall survival were 62.3% and 71.5%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that tumour grade ( p = 0.047), number of neoadjuvant therapy cycles ( p = 0.042), resection status ( p = 0.043), pathological N stage ( p < 0.001) and adjuvant treatment ( p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival. However, advanced pathological N stage was identified as the sole independent factor that correlated with worse overall survival ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: This real-world study validates the clinical efficacy and safety of neoCIT for resected oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma while demonstrating encouraging survival outcomes.
Yu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: