Cannabis use among older adults has gained attention in recent years due to its growing therapeutic applications and increasing legalization. However, research on the perceptions of cannabis among older adults, particularly those aged 75–80, remains limited. This study explored cannabis use perceptions among older adults through the lens of ageism, examining how societal and internalized age-based biases influence their attitudes and beliefs. A descriptive survey design was employed, and data were collected from 100 older adults using structured questionnaires. The instruments included a Cannabis Perceptions Scale and the Perceived Ageism Questionnaire (PAQ), both validated for reliability. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression were used to analyze the data. Findings revealed that older adults recognize both potential benefits and health risks of cannabis use, with social stigma and disapproval being prominent barriers. The analysis further indicated a significant relationship between perceived ageism and negative perceptions of cannabis (r = 0.62, p < 0.05). Regression analysis showed that ageism accounted for 38% of the variance in negative attitudes toward cannabis, suggesting that older adults who experience higher levels of age-based discrimination are more likely to hold conservative or cautious views regarding its use. The study concludes that ageism, both societal and internalized, substantially shapes older adults’ perceptions of cannabis, limiting their engagement with potentially beneficial treatments. These findings underscore the need for age-sensitive health education, policy reforms, and healthcare practices that reduce stigma and empower older adults to make informed decisions. Future research should explore interventions that address internalized ageism and examine cannabis perceptions in broader geographic and cultural contexts. Overall, the study highlights the intersection of aging, societal bias, and health behavior, offering insights for public health, clinical practice, and policy aimed at supporting older adults’ autonomy and well-being.
Oniomovigho et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: