What are the outcomes, diagnostic yields, and resource utilization of pre-participation screening across different age groups of competitive athletes?
Pre-participation screening in competitive athletes demonstrates a low overall rate of cardiac diagnoses that increases significantly with age, though there is considerable variability among physicians in interpreting abnormal ECGs.
AIMS: To evaluate outcomes and resource utilization of preparticipation screening (PPS) in a cohort of young (≤18 years), adult (19-34 years), and master (≥35 years) competitive athletes. METHOD AND RESULTS: Retrospective analysis of structured clinical records of consecutive PPS collected in the years 2018-2024, by 30 sports physicians across 26 sports medicine centres.The study included 111.062 PPS performed in 61.731 competitive athletes (68.8% males): 47.4% were young, 31.3% were adult, and 20.8% were master athletes. Overall, 102.646 (92.4%) PPS were cleared for competitive sports activity after a normal first-line investigation while 8.416 (7.6%) required one or further investigations: 5.0%, 6.5% and 15.0% in the three age subgroups respectively (p=0.001). Finally, 378 (0.34%) PPS reported a disease or a condition at risk. The prevalence of cardiac diagnoses increased progressively from 0.06%, to 0.12%, and to 1.19% in the three age subgroups respectively (p=0.001). The abnormal ECGs rate per physician prompting second-line investigation ranged from 0% to 7.1% (median 1.5%, IQR 0.7% - 2.1%). The average cost per PPS of first and second-line investigations was €60, €62 and €107 for the 3 subgroups respectively. Costs for third-line tests and consultations were not considered. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of abnormal findings rose progressively with age, especially in master athletes. Sport physicians showed considerable differences in defining abnormal ECGs.
Gaggioli et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: