This working paper is the second paper in the series Defense, Self, and Speech: From Biological Vectors to Linguistic Form. Paper II asks whether compensatory-defensive speech can be formalized in a way that makes it partially computable. It argues that this is possible through two coupled axes: a finite operational basis of speech-level operations organized by biological defensive vectors, and a (P, T, M) latent-space architecture describing prior dominance, threat-channel precision bias, and meta-inference depth. The paper develops the methodological warrant for ontology-bounded classification of compensatory-defensive speech. It distinguishes operations from templates and regimes, defines first-order defensive operations and META operations, explains how operations compose across utterances and contexts, and proposes an ecological/compensatory discriminator based on proportionality, reversibility, and contact-preservation. This paper is theoretical and methodological. It does not present an empirical validation study, a clinical diagnostic instrument, or a finalized computational engine. Subsequent papers in the series develop the engine, trajectory modeling, empirical corpus work, and applications to human and machine dialogue.
Maria Svet (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: