This study evaluates the seismic performance and life-cycle economic implications of designing essential urban mid-rise reinforced concrete moment-resistant frame (MRF) buildings to maintain linear elastic behavior up to the Immediate Occupancy (IO) performance level. While most urban buildings are commonly designed to respond non-linearly in order to reduce initial construction costs, the current Mexico City Building Code (MCBC) permits that essential facilities, such as hospitals and schools, maintain linear behavior during moderate-to-strong earthquakes. This code establishes a maximum story drift ratio equal to 0.0075 for essential buildings constituted by MRF subjected to seismic events with a 250-year recurrence interval; in addition, it recommends ductile structural behavior to achieve Life Safety performance at a 450-year recurrence interval. Given the significant differences in occupancy, functionality, and contents of critical facilities, here it is analyzed whether the linear elastic design criterion is efficient for both secondary care hospitals and public schools. Two three-story and five-story MRF buildings, located on firm and transition soil, respectively, are analyzed. This study addresses the probability of brittle-type failure risk, the optimal allowable story drift at the IO performance level, the potential need for use-dependent drift limits, and the contribution of contents and nonstructural components to the total expected seismic losses. The seismic risk and economic performance are quantified through seismic hazard analysis, incremental dynamic analysis, fragility modeling, Monte Carlo simulation, and life-cycle cost evaluation.
Rodriguez et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: