= 63) matched by age and gender. All participants completed standardized measures of EF and ToM. Group differences and mediation models were examined. Results demonstrated that children with ADHD performed significantly lower than their peers in most EF domains and across all ToM tasks. Working memory and selective attention were the strongest predictors of ToM performance, accounting for 16.8% to 51.8% of the variance in different ToM components. Ten mediation models confirmed partial mediation, with indirect effects accounting for 15.8% to 37.8% of the total effect in most models. In some models, such as Perspective Taking and Second-Order Emotion Attribution, indirect effects exceeded 50%, indicating a more substantial role of EF. Nevertheless, a considerable portion of the effect remained unexplained by EF alone. These findings indicate that EF, particularly working memory and selective attention, play an important but not exclusive role in ToM performance in ADHD. This pattern supports a multidimensional understanding of ToM and emphasizes its relevance for neuropsychological assessment in ADHD.
Pineda-Alhucema et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: