Cascading failures of clustered landslide dams can intensify downstream hazards not only by increasing peak flood magnitude but also by accelerating the rise of water level immediately upstream of successive dams, thereby shortening the available response time before overtopping. This study reports large-scale flume experiments on a three-dam cascade built with identical geometry and similar soil gradation, while systematically varying longitudinal spacing and inflow discharge. The principal measured variable, Cw(t), is defined here as the local forebay run-up/water-level record measured at a fixed gauge position immediately upstream of each dam. The run-up hydrographs were summarized using peak run-up Cwmax, threshold-arrival time ta defined at 0.1 Cwmax, time to peak tp, maximum rising-stage rate Smax, and above-threshold duration T. Across ten tests (five spacing configurations under low/high discharge), peak run-up at both downstream dams consistently exceeded that at Dam1, with amplification factors relative to Dam1 of 1.11–1.45 at Dam2 and 1.13–1.42 at Dam3; Dam3 was not always higher than Dam2. Amplification was much stronger in the rising-stage dynamics: Smax increased relative to Dam1 by factors of 1.56–11.0 at Dam2 and 2.27–14.0 at Dam3, demonstrating pronounced downstream wavefront steepening. Higher discharge produced earlier threshold arrivals and peaks throughout the cascade, whereas shorter spacing generally produced more impulsive downstream responses with sharper peaks and larger rate amplification. Overall, the dataset provides stage/run-up-based constraints on cascade amplification and indicates that, within the present experimental matrix, dam spacing is the dominant geometric control on flood propagation and downstream hazard escalation.
Zhang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.