June 12, 2017Open Access

Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The World Association of Medical Journal Editors (WAME) Board has recently announced the publication of the WAME statement on Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-Journals (posted on February 18, 2017). Members of WAME are permitted to republish the statement in their journals. As Editor-in-Chief and Editor of Journal of Enam Medical College are members of WAME, we are republishing this important paper in Journal of Enam Medical College. J Enam Med Col 2017; 7(2): 62-68

Perguntar à IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lainé et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd196c7f24f003e8270342 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2017.031

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Heard on the Net2013 · 5 citations
2Heard on the Net2013 · 9 citations
3ResearchGate is no longer reliable: leniency towards ghost journals may decrease its impact on the scientific community.2016 · 35 citations
4Firm action needed on predatory journals2015 · 243 citations
5Mystery as controversial list of predatory publishers disappears2017 · 20 citations

Perguntar à IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper