Existing ship emission inventories for coastal seas are typically gridded at 500 m to 1 km, a resolution too coarse to distinguish navigation channels from anchorage zones. Whether the hotspot patterns reported at such scales reflect true emission geography or are artifacts of spatial averaging remains an open question. We construct a 100 m resolution AIS-based emission inventory for two contrasting coastal environments in eastern China—the Yangtze River estuary and the Wenzhou coastal area—using the STEAM framework, and we quantify spatial concentration with Lorenz curve analyses. At this finer resolution, three emission archetypes become separable: discrete anchorage clusters, bankside berthing bands flanking navigation lanes, and sinuous riverbank traces in confined waterways. Emissions are extremely concentrated: the top 1% of grid cells capture over three-quarters of the total theoretical emission potential (Gini = 0.940), and this pattern persists across all months of 2023. Reaggregating the same data to 1 km reduces the top-1% share by roughly 10%, confirming that coarse gridding systematically understates anchorage contributions while overstating those of transit corridors. A dedicated sensitivity analysis on auxiliary engine load assumptions (±30% perturbation of canonical Jalkanen-style load brackets) shows that, while absolute emission totals carry approximately ±15% uncertainty, the spatial concentration of emissions is highly robust: Across all perturbation scenarios, the Gini coefficient varies by less than 0.01, the top-5% emission share varies by less than 2 percentage points, and the location of top-5% hotspot cells overlaps by ≥97.9% (Jaccard index). The results highlight stationary vessel hotspots—discrete anchorages and bankside berths—as a major and previously underemphasized contributor to the cumulative coastal ship emission budget, complementing rather than replacing the conventional navigation-lane focus, with direct implications for shore power siting, anchorage management, and emission control zone design.
Sun et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: