Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVES: The review aims to identify available evidence related to the effects of dignity therapy on dignity, psychological well-being, and quality of life (QoL) among patients with cancer under palliative care. METHODS: Thirteen electronic databases were searched for published articles in English or Chinese from inception to May 2018. Methodological rigour was assessed through the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. Sufficient data from four trials were statistically pooled with Review Manager; otherwise, a narrative summary was used. RESULTS: Ten articles describing eight studies met the selection criteria and were included in the review. None of the studies met all JBI checklist criteria. Meta-analysis results revealed that dignity therapy significantly improved dignity-related distress in existential distress domain (mean differences MD: -0.26, 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.02, .03) and social support domain (MD: -0.23, 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.07, .004), but nonsignificant improved depression and anxiety. Narrative summaries indicated that dignity therapy exerted positive effects on patients' dignity, psychological well-being, and QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Dignity therapy is a promising approach to improve psychological well-being among patients with cancer under palliative care. However, the effects of dignity therapy on dignity and QoL are inconsistent. Further extensive studies should measure the impact of dignity therapy through qualitative and quantitative approaches to establish outcomes in psychological well-being. Studies with sensitivity to the cultural context within which dignity therapy applied should be conducted to explore its effects on patients with cancer at the early stages of illness trajectory.
Xiao et al. (Thu,) studied this question.