The Yellow River Delta, a young alluvial plain in China, is experiencing severe land subsidence that threatens its ecological security and sustainable development. However, the driving mechanisms of this subsidence exhibit strong spatial heterogeneity, which traditional global models fail to capture. This study integrates high-precision subsidence measurements from Sentinel-1A imagery and SBAS-InSAR technology (2017–2023) with multi-source environmental factors (topography, geology, land use, precipitation) to propose a Spatially Adaptive Ensemble Learning Model with feature selection (SA-GSE). The model concatenates predictions from base learners (CatBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest) with spatial features (e.g., distance to salt pans, local topographic variance) to form meta-features, which are then input into a multilayer perceptron meta-learner. Through 5-fold spatial cross-validation, SA-GSE learns spatially dynamic base-model weights, implicitly adapting to regional variations in subsidence drivers. The model achieves an R2 of 0.7810 and RMSE of 40.55 mm/yr on the test set, outperforming individual base models and ordinary stacking. Residual spatial autocorrelation is substantially reduced, with SA-GSE yielding the lowest Moran’s I (0.0334, p = 0.206) among all evaluated models, confirming effective capture of spatial heterogeneity. Driving force analysis reveals that distance to salt pans is the most important predictor (permutation importance: 0.4456), underscoring the dominant role of brine extraction-induced aquifer compaction. Lagged precipitation importance (0.3191) exceeds that of current precipitation (0.2453), indicating a recharge lag effect. SHAP interaction analysis uncovers a nonlinear “precipitation decoupling” mechanism in salt pan areas, where high precipitation paradoxically exacerbates subsidence. The resultant map of predicted subsidence rates highlights elevated rate zones in the northern salt pans and along the Guangli River. While the map does not represent a full risk assessment—as it does not include exposure or vulnerability—it provides a spatially explicit estimate of hazard likelihood. This ensemble framework yields novel perspectives on subsidence drivers in heterogeneous regions and can support land subsidence prevention and groundwater management planning.
Zhang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.