Abstract Objectives This study evaluated whether spectrophotometric CIELAB color measurements can support machine-learning (ML) classification of occlusal caries severity based on ICDAS categories. Methods Three hundred extracted human teeth were visually classified using ICDAS (0–4) and served as labels for supervised learning. Five occlusal sites per tooth were measured using a spectrophotometer under standardized conditions. Site-level CIELAB values were transformed into engineered color features and aggregated at the tooth level. Teeth were categorised as sound (ICDAS 0), initial carious lesions (1–2), and moderate carious lesions (3–4). Five ML models: Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, CatBoost, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and a Deep Sets architecture were trained. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, balanced accuracy (BA), and macro-F1, with additional binary analyses for early (ICDAS 1–4 vs. 0) and operative lesion detection (ICDAS 3–4 vs. 0–2), based on the included ICDAS range. Learning curve analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of training data size on model performance. Results Deep Sets achieved the highest multiclass performance (BA = 0.89) followed by the MLP (BA = 0.72). Tree-based models demonstrated lower performance overall. For early lesion detection, all models showed high sensitivity (SE) but reduced specificity (SP). At the operative level, the MLP achieved 100% SE and moderate SP. Learning-curve analysis showed that neural models benefited most from increased training data, whereas tree-based models showed limited improvement. Conclusion Under controlled in-vitro conditions, spectrophotometric CIELAB measurements enabled machine-learning classification of occlusal caries severity. Deep sets achieved the highest overall performance, supporting the potential of color-based approaches as adjunctive tools for caries assessment. Clinical relevance Spectrophotometric tooth color measurements may support machine learning classification of occlusal caries severity under controlled conditions, using an image-independent approach. Such color-based methods may complement visual assessment by providing a more standardized and reproducible evaluation of enamel changes following further validation.
Rashid et al. (Thu,) studied this question.